Appwrite vs Supabase
Comparing two backend as a service platforms on pricing, features, free tier, and trade-offs.
Quick summary
Appwrite — Open source backend platform for developers. Appwrite is an open-source end-to-end backend server that provides auth, databases, storage, functions, and messaging.
Supabase — The open source Firebase alternative. Supabase is an open-source backend-as-a-service built on PostgreSQL. It provides authentication, realtime subscriptions, storage, edge functions, and a hosted database.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Appwrite | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | $15/mo | $25/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Auth | Yes | Yes |
| Storage | Yes | Yes |
| Database | MariaDB | PostgreSQL |
| Realtime | Yes | Yes |
| Free Tier | Yes | 500MB DB + 1GB storage |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Edge Functions | Yes | Yes |
| Row Level Security | Yes | Yes |
Appwrite
Open source backend platform for developers
Pros
- Fully open source
- Self-hostable with Docker
- Multiple SDK languages
Cons
- Smaller community vs Supabase/Firebase
- Fewer third-party integrations
Supabase
The open source Firebase alternative
Pros
- Open source and self-hostable
- Standard PostgreSQL — no vendor lock-in
- Generous free tier
- Great DX with auto-generated APIs
Cons
- Cold starts on free tier
- Edge function ecosystem still maturing
Which should you choose?
Choose Appwrite if you value open source and want the option to self-host, and a free tier is important for your stage. Choose Supabase if you value open source and want the option to self-host, and a free tier is important for your stage.