Nhost vs Supabase
Comparing two backend as a service platforms on pricing, features, free tier, and trade-offs.
Quick summary
Nhost — Open source Firebase alternative with GraphQL. Nhost is an open-source backend platform combining PostgreSQL, Hasura GraphQL, authentication, and storage.
Supabase — The open source Firebase alternative. Supabase is an open-source backend-as-a-service built on PostgreSQL. It provides authentication, realtime subscriptions, storage, edge functions, and a hosted database.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Nhost | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | $25/mo | $25/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Auth | Yes | Yes |
| Storage | Yes | Yes |
| Database | PostgreSQL | PostgreSQL |
| Realtime | Yes | Yes |
| Free Tier | Yes | 500MB DB + 1GB storage |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Edge Functions | Yes | Yes |
| Row Level Security | Yes | Yes |
Nhost
Open source Firebase alternative with GraphQL
Pros
- GraphQL-first via Hasura
- Postgres + open source
- Good developer experience
Cons
- Smaller community
- GraphQL learning curve
Supabase
The open source Firebase alternative
Pros
- Open source and self-hostable
- Standard PostgreSQL — no vendor lock-in
- Generous free tier
- Great DX with auto-generated APIs
Cons
- Cold starts on free tier
- Edge function ecosystem still maturing
Which should you choose?
Choose Nhost if you value open source and want the option to self-host, and a free tier is important for your stage. Choose Supabase if you value open source and want the option to self-host, and a free tier is important for your stage.